Montana DOC Controversies and Political Ethics Violations
In this week's episode of the Montana Values Podcast, we examine the troubling patterns emerging from Montana's Department of Corrections and ongoing ethics scandals among state legislative leadership. From prison proposals to political vendettas, Episode 99 exposes the reality behind these public institutions.
The Montana DOC's Prison Plans: What Communities Need to Know
The Montana Department of Corrections is currently eyeing multiple counties—Butte, Silver Bow, Yellowstone, Anaconda, Deer Lodge, and Jefferson—for a potential $220 million women's prison. Despite their claims of conducting "friendly conversations" with communities, the DOC's actions in Flathead County tell a different story.
When Flathead County's Board of Adjustment determined a pre-release center was inappropriate for a high-density trailer park area in Evergreen, the DOC responded with litigation rather than cooperation. Their settlement proposal demands the Board change their factual findings—essentially forcing them to reverse their decision.
This approach isn't new. Counties across Montana have grown frustrated with the DOC's tactics:

• Multiple county jails now refuse to take state prisoners
  
• The state is shipping over 600 prisoners to Arizona
  
• The DOC operates with deliberate vagueness about their intentions
  

For community members: If the DOC approaches your area, attend all meetings, ask specific questions about infrastructure impacts, and demand clear answers about their plans before they're finalized.
Senate Leadership Ethics Violations: A Web of Deception
Former Senate President Jason Ellsworth faces an ethics investigation for awarding $170,000 in government contracts to a longtime business associate, Bryce Eggleston. The contracts were split to avoid public bidding requirements—after Ellsworth's own committee rejected the proposal as unnecessary.
Meanwhile, current Senate President Matt Regier—who pushed for Ellsworth's investigation—has his own ethical issues. Regier hired personal attorney Abby Jane Moscatel with nearly $23,000 in taxpayer money, despite:

• No legislative authority to do so
  
• Failing to get his bill (HB260) passed that would have authorized such hiring
  
• Splitting contracts to keep payments under $10,000 to avoid public notice
  

Both cases reveal a pattern: legislative leaders circumventing rules to funnel public money toward personal connections.
Ellsworth's $5 Million Claim Against Montana Taxpayers
Senator Ellsworth has filed a $5 million tort claim (which costs Montana taxpayers), claiming defamation and emotional distress from the ethics investigation. This comes despite his documented history:

• A $600,000 settlement with the FTC for deceptive telemarketing practices (2008)
  
• Being held in contempt of court after that settlement
  
• Pleading guilty to obstruction of justice after intimidating a highway patrol officer (2023)
  

Ellsworth now claims he's taking medical leave due to "objective symptoms of harm" from the ethics investigation publicity.
What Montana Citizens Can Do

1. Stay informed: These ethical issues directly affect how your tax dollars are spent and how public institutions are managed.
   
2. Attend public meetings: The DOC and legislative committees often make significant decisions with minimal public input.
   
3. Ask questions: When officials make vague promises about economic benefits, request specific data about impacts on local services and infrastructure.
   
4. Contact your representatives: Let them know you expect transparency and ethical behavior from public officials.
   
5. Follow local reporting: Support journalism that investigates these issues—like the Montana Free Press and Montana Standard reporting cited in the episode.
   

The Montana Values Podcast continues to examine these critical issues affecting Montana communities. To share your thoughts or Montana values, email us at [email protected] or follow us on X (formerly Twitter) at @MTValues.
Find us on Podbean or your favorite podcast platform. If you appreciate our work exposing political corruption and holding leaders accountable, consider supporting us through our website at montanavaluespodcast.com

Sponsored by The Syndicate Hair and Beauty Parlor in Evergreen. Affordable walk-in haircuts for men and kids. Located at 2302 Highway 2 East (next to Evergreen Fire Department). Visit thesyndicatehair.com or call 406-212-7991.

Montana's Legal Maze: Breaking Down House Bill 121 and the DOC Controversy
Montana Values Podcast (Episode 98) discusses two issues affecting Montanans: the Department of Corrections' (DOC) attempt to establish a pre-release center in Evergreen and the controversial House Bill 121. Host Tammi Fisher provides sharp commentary on the legal, bureaucratic, and social flaws in both cases, highlighting the implications for taxpayers and communities alike.

Key Takeaways
DOC's Pre-Release Center Proposal:
The DOC is pushing for a pre-release center in Evergreen despite past community opposition and the fact that Montana's 10 existing centers are not at capacity.
To bypass a law prohibiting pre-release centers near schools, the DOC proposed operating the center itself instead of using a non-governmental organization (NGO).
The Flathead County Board of Adjustment ultimately rejected the location due to its proximity to schools, location inside of a trailer park, and unsuitable infrastructure. However, the DOC responded by suing the county, creating a taxpayer-funded legal battle.

House Bill 121:
Known as the "Bathroom Bill," this legislation seeks to enforce restroom use based on biological sex. The bill places liability on public entities (schools, shelters, and government facilities) instead of individuals who violate the gender designations, creating legal and financial risks for taxpayers. Vague language and lack of clear enforcement guidelines raise concerns about practical application and potential misuse by bad actors.

The DOC and Evergreen’s Struggle
The Montana Department of Corrections has been determined to place a Pre-Release Center in Flathead County, despite community resistance and a lack of demonstrated need. Legislators allocated $7.1 million for the project, even though the State’s existing Pre-Release Centers remain below capacity.
Major Concerns Raised:
Location Issues:
The proposed site is in the middle of a trailer park, surrounded by schools, bars, and casinos—factors that are counterproductive for rehabilitation efforts.
The site’s roads are not up to county standards, and the increased traffic would create additional safety hazards.
Lack of Transparency:
The DOC refused to disclose alternative locations during public meetings, despite claiming to have considered four other sites. Community members and local officials have described the DOC’s approach as secretive and dismissive of public input.
Legal Battle:
After the Board of Adjustment denied the request, the DOC filed a lawsuit, claiming the board “abused its discretion.” This lawsuit essentially pits Montana taxpayers against themselves, with state funds being used to sue local government entities.

The Bathroom Bill: House Bill 121
House Bill 121 has been presented as a measure to protect privacy and safety in public restrooms, changing rooms, and sleeping quarters by requiring access to be based on biological sex. While the bill’s proponents argue it safeguards against harassment and assault, critics point out its significant flaws.

Key Issues with the Bill:
Misplaced Liability:
The bill does not penalize individuals who violate restroom rules. Instead, it allows individuals to sue public entities, such as schools or shelters, for “allowing” violations to occur.
Taxpayers ultimately bear the financial burden of lawsuits, while offenders face no direct consequences.
Vague Language:
The bill requires public entities to take “reasonable steps” to ensure compliance but does not define what these steps entail. This lack of clarity leaves schools, shelters, and government facilities guessing about enforcement, potentially leading to invasive practices like verifying individuals’ biological sex.
Practical Challenges:
The legislation does not address actual safety concerns, such as harassment or assault, which are already covered by existing laws. It shifts focus away from pressing issues like affordable housing, living wages, and crime prevention, instead creating unnecessary legal and bureaucratic complications.
Broader Implications
Critics argue that both the DOC’s actions and House Bill 121 reflect broader issues with Montana’s governance, including poor planning, lack of transparency, and a tendency to focus on divisive policies rather than meaningful solutions.
​
Why These Issues Matter:
Taxpayer Impact:
The DOC lawsuit and House Bill 121’s litigation risks could result in significant costs for Montana taxpayers, with no clear benefits.
Community Distrust:
The DOC’s handling of the pre-release center has eroded trust between state officials and local communities, particularly in Evergreen.
Missed Opportunities:
Instead of addressing critical needs like housing, job training, and rehabilitation programs, lawmakers are prioritizing legislation that creates more problems than it solves.
Summary
Both the DOC controversy and House Bill 121 highlight the need for better planning, transparency, and prioritization in Montana’s policymaking. The DOC’s lawsuit against Flathead County exemplifies the pitfalls of bureaucratic overreach, while House Bill 121 raises serious questions about practicality, fairness, and unintended consequences.
Key Questions Moving Forward:
How can Montana ensure that public funds are used responsibly to address real community needs?
What steps can be taken to improve transparency and accountability in government decision-making?
How can lawmakers avoid creating vague or unenforceable legislation that places unnecessary burdens on taxpayers?
Montanans deserve thoughtful, effective policies that address real challenges without adding unnecessary costs or legal risks. By staying informed and engaged, citizens can hold their leaders accountable and push for meaningful reforms that benefit everyone.

Episode 97: The Helena Swamp Boils Over—Corruption, Contracts, and Accountability in Montana Politics.

This week, we’re diving into one of the most contentious issues in Montana politics today: the scandal surrounding State Senator Jason Ellsworth. If you’re fed up with corruption in government or feeling powerless about where your taxpayer dollars are going, this episode is a must-listen. We’re here to expose the truth, break down the facts, and empower you with actionable steps to demand accountability.

Ellsworth’s actions, from awarding a $170,000 no-bid contract to a newly formed company owned by an associate to his long history of ethical violations, are shocking. But even more troubling is the lack of oversight from the Montana Department of Administration, which allowed this deal to happen without proper checks and balances. This is more than just a political scandal—it’s a direct attack on the values Montanans hold dear: honesty, responsibility, and accountability.

In this episode, we’ll explore:

• The details of Ellsworth’s shady backroom dealings.
• How Montana’s government let this happen and what needs to change.
• What this scandal means for taxpayers and the future of governance in Montana.

The Corruption Unfolds: What’s Happening in Montana Politics?
1. The No-Bid Contract That Sparked Outrage
At the heart of the controversy is a $170,000 no-bid contract between Senator Jason Ellsworth and a newly formed company called Agile Analytics, owned by his associate, Bryce Eggleston. The company was created just two weeks before the contract was signed, raising immediate suspicions about its legitimacy and purpose. To make matters worse, the Judicial Oversight and Reform Committee, which Ellsworth chaired at the time, had previously voted to reject hiring outside contractors. Instead of respecting the committee’s decision, Ellsworth bypassed the process and approved the deal on his own. His justification? He claimed the work was essential and urgent. But taxpayers weren’t convinced, and neither were other lawmakers. This blatant disregard for transparency and proper procedure is an insult to every Montanan who expects their government to act fairly and responsibly.
2. A Troubled Past: Ellsworth’s History of Misconduct
Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time Jason Ellsworth’s actions have been called into question. His political career has been littered with ethical violations and troubling behavior, including: Federal Fraud Case: Ellsworth faced a $600,000 fine for allegations related to violating the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act.
Highway Patrol Incident: In one particularly infamous incident in 2021, Ellsworth
obstructed a highway patrol officer during a traffic stop, attempting to use his political position to avoid consequences. He ultimately pled guilty becoming the symbol of abuse of power in Montana.
Pattern of Misconduct: His past actions paint a clear picture of someone who
consistently bends the rules to serve his own interests.
This latest scandal only adds to his reputation as a politician who operates outside the bounds of what’s ethical and acceptable.
3. The Department of Administration’s Role in the Scandal
While Ellsworth’s actions are deeply troubling, the Montana Department of Administration (DOA) also deserves scrutiny. The DOA approved the $170,000 contract without requiring competitive bidding, as mandated by state rules for contracts exceeding $100,000. Instead, they allowed the deal to move forward under the pretense of an “emergency” or “exigency”. But was there an emergency? The answer, as you might expect, is no. The desire to spend money before your authority to spend money is revoked, is not an emergency. This was simply a
feigned “loophole” exploited to push through a deal that should never have been approved. The DOA’s failure to enforce transparency and accountability is yet another example of how systemic flaws enable corruption in government.
4. Bipartisan Calls for Ethics Investigations
The fallout from Ellsworth’s actions has created a rare moment of bipartisan agreement: both Democrats and Republicans are [finally] demanding accountability. Senate President Matt Regier and Senator Daniel Emrich, both Republicans, have spoken out against Ellsworth’s actions. This isn’t about partisan politics—it’s about doing what’s right for Montana. Both sides of the aisle have a chance to come together and demonstrate that corruption has no place in our government.
Why Montanans Should Care
This scandal isn’t just about one politician’s bad behavior—it’s about the systemic failures that allow corruption to thrive. When elected officials abuse their power and government agencies fail to enforce the rules, it’s the taxpayers who pay the price. Every dollar spent on shady deals is a dollar that could have been used to improve schools, repair infrastructure, or support essential services.
Montana deserves leaders who act with integrity and put the needs of their constituents first. This case is a wake-up call for voters, lawmakers, and government watchdogs alike.
What You Can Do: Action Steps for Change
Feeling frustrated or powerless about this situation? You’re not alone—but there are concrete steps you can take to make a difference:
1. Stay Informed
2. Knowledge is power. Follow reputable news outlets, read government reports, and listen to podcasts like this one to stay updated on Ellsworth’s case and other political issues affecting Montana.
3. Speak Out
4. Contact your local representatives and demand a full investigation into Ellsworth’s actions. Let them know that you expect transparency, accountability, and consequences for unethical behavior.
5. Vote Wisely
6. Elections have consequences. Take the time to research candidates thoroughly and vote for those who have a proven track record of integrity and public service.
7. Report Misconduct
8. If you suspect fraud, waste, or abuse in government, don’t stay silent. Use
Montana’s Legislative Audit Division hotline to report your concerns.
9. Engage in Conversations
10. Share this podcast episode with friends and family to spread awareness. Corruption thrives in silence, so let’s start talking about what we can do to demand better from our leaders.
Quotes That Hit Home
“Jason Ellsworth doesn’t care what the rules are—he’ll do whatever he wants, whenever he wants.”
“The Department of Administration’s complicity in this deal is a slap in the face to
Montana taxpayers.”
“If not now, when? It’s time for both parties to work together to eliminate corruption from our state government.”
Final Thoughts: Montana Deserves Better
The Jason Ellsworth scandal is about more than just one bad actor—it’s a stark reminder of the importance of checks and balances, transparency, and accountability in government. As Montanans, we have a responsibility to demand better from our leaders and to hold them accountable when they fall short.
Let this episode serve as a rallying cry for reform. Together, we can shine a light on corruption and work toward a government that truly reflects Montana’s values.
Thank you for tuning in to the Montana Values Podcast. Don’t forget to subscribe, follow us on social media, and share your thoughts. Let’s keep fighting for what’s right.
Call to Action
Visit Us: Head to MontanaValuesPodcast.com to support the show and stay updated.
Follow Us: Connect with us on X (formerly Twitter) @MTValues.
Share the Episode: Spread the word—Montana’s future depends on it!

When Healthcare Goes Wrong
As a Montanan who has spent over two decades examining healthcare from both patient and business perspectives, I want to share some critical insights from our latest Montana Values podcast episode. What happened at St. Peter's Hospital in Helena serves as a stark warning about what can go wrong when profit motives overshadow patient care.

The Story That Shocked Montana
In August 2020, Scott Warwick's tragic case exposed deep flaws in our healthcare system. After receiving aggressive chemotherapy for 11 years, it was discovered he never had cancer. His story isn't just about one doctor's misconduct – it reveals how unchecked power and inadequate oversight can devastate lives.

Red Flags Every Montanan Should Know
1. Isolation Tactics: If a specialist insists on being your only doctor and discourages sharing records with other providers, this is a major warning sign. As we learned from the Helena case, good doctors welcome collaboration and second opinions.
2. Volume Over Quality: When a doctor sees 60+ patients daily, question the quality of care. Quality healthcare takes time, especially in specialties like oncology.
3. Documentation Issues: Always request and review your medical records. In Scott Warwick's case, there was never a definitive cancer diagnosis – just a preliminary report that said cells were "most likely consistent with cancer.”

The Power of Nurses' Knowledge
Here's something I've learned after 13 years working with healthcare professionals: Nurses know. They see everything. When choosing a doctor, ask nurses these questions:
•             "Who would you trust with your family's care?"
•             "Which doctor would you recommend for [specific procedure]?"
Pay attention not just to what they say, but what they don't say. If you mention a doctor is "nice" and all they do is agree about the niceness, take note.

The Bigger Picture
While most healthcare providers in Montana are dedicated professionals who put patients first, the St. Peter's Hospital case shows what happens when oversight fails. The hospital ultimately paid $10.8 million in federal settlements – money that could have gone to patient care, nursing staff, and supporting good doctors.

Call to Action
As Montanans, we must:
1.          Demand transparency from healthcare institutions
2.          Support medical professionals who speak up about concerns
3.          Share information about both good and bad experiences
4.          Remember: Being nice doesn't equal being competent

Final Thoughts
Healthcare in Montana faces unique challenges due to our rural nature and limited options. But by staying informed and vigilant, we can protect ourselves and our loved ones. Trust, but verify. And remember – your health is your most valuable asset. Don't be afraid to advocate for yourself in our healthcare system.

 Follow @MTValues on X (Twitter).

Episode 95 - A Deep Dive into Montana’s Post-Election Landscape

As the dust settles on Montana’s latest election cycle, we at the Montana Values Podcast are unpacking the results in Episode 95, offering a comprehensive analysis of what happened, why it matters, and what we can all do moving forward. This election wasn’t just about winners and losers—it revealed deeper shifts in voter behavior, party dynamics, and the evolving political identity of our state.

Here’s what we learned and how you can stay informed, engaged, and active in shaping Montana’s future.

Montana’s Political Landscape: A Sea of Red

One of the most striking outcomes from this election was the overwhelming support for Republican candidates, consistent with national trends. But what really caught our attention was the significant number of Democrats crossing over to vote for Republicans. This shift, a potential red flag for the Democratic Party, highlights a broader realignment in political loyalties.

This isn’t just theory—we’re seeing it play out in Montana’s election results. It’s a wake-up call for both major parties, signaling a need to better understand and connect with voters who are stepping outside traditional party lines.

Record Voter Turnout: Montana Shows Up

Montanans showed up in record numbers, with 74.49% of registered voters casting their ballots. Nearly 600,000 of the 800,000 registered voters participated, demonstrating just how invested we are in the issues that shape our state. This level of turnout reflects the high stakes and shows how deeply people care about Montana’s future.

Action Step: Stay Engaged
• Keep this momentum going. Make a plan to vote in every election, not just the high-profile ones. Local races often have a direct impact on our day-to-day lives.
• Talk with friends and family about the importance of voting to inspire others to join you at the polls.

The Rise of Independents: A Glimmer of Change

Elena Evans, an independent candidate for the Public Service Commission, stood out as a beacon of grassroots determination. While she didn’t win, her ability to rally 158 volunteers and collect 6,000 signatures demonstrates the growing appetite for alternatives to the two-party system.

Evans’ campaign is proof that independent candidates can make waves, even in deeply partisan districts. This could mark the beginning of a broader trend where voters prioritize candidates’ values over party affiliation.

Action Step: Support Independent Voices
• Learn about independent candidates running in your area and their platforms.
• Volunteer or donate to campaigns that align with your values to help amplify their reach.

Democratic Anomalies and Republican Triumphs

Despite the Republican dominance, Democrats like Dave Fern and Debo Powers pulled off surprising victories in traditionally conservative districts. Their secret? Grassroots campaigning and strong personal connections with voters. This proves that candidate quality and effort can transcend party lines.

On the flip side, we discuss concerns about Republican candidates who may take their positions for granted. Lukas Schubert, for example, was criticized for failing to engage with local issues in Evergreen despite his victory for HD 8.

Action Step: Hold Leaders Accountable
• Attend town halls and community forums to ask questions and voice concerns.
• Follow up on campaign promises and push for action where it’s needed most.

Tester’s Loss and Broader Implications

Jon Tester’s loss to Tim Sheehy was a pivotal moment for Montana Democrats. Tester’s unwavering support for national figures like Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas may have alienated voters in a state shifting further to the right.

This race, along with others, underscores the growing polarization in Montana. With Republicans holding majorities across all branches of state government, they have a golden opportunity to deliver on campaign promises. But they’ll need to tread carefully to maintain the trust placed in them by voters.


Action Step: Stay Informed and Active
• Read up on policies being proposed in the state legislature and how they affect you.
• Join or start local groups to advocate for issues you care about, ensuring your voice is heard.

Voter Behavior: What’s Driving the Shifts?

The crossover voting we saw in this election raises an important question: Why are voters switching sides? From dissatisfaction with national party policies to a preference for local candidates who resonate with their values, the reasons are varied and complex. This trend underscores the need for all parties to listen more and engage better.

Action Step: Bridge the Gap
• Initiate respectful conversations with people who hold differing political views. Understanding their perspectives can foster a healthier political climate.
• Focus on issues rather than party labels when discussing politics with your community.

The Road Ahead: What Can We Do?

As we reflect on Montana’s election results, we’re reminded of the power we hold as voters. By staying informed, engaging with our leaders, and taking action, we can shape a government that truly reflects our values.

Here’s How We Can All Make a Difference:
1. Stay Informed: Follow reputable news sources to track political developments in Montana and beyond.
2. Get Involved Locally: Attend city council meetings or state legislature sessions to understand the decisions being made.
3. Vote in Every Election: From school boards to statewide offices, every vote counts.
4. Volunteer: Support candidates or causes you believe in by donating your time or resources.
5. Educate and Empower: Share what you’ve learned with friends and family to encourage thoughtful conversations and greater participation.

Final Thoughts: The Power of Participation

Montana’s election results are a testament to the strength of our democratic process and the importance of showing up. Whether it’s voting, volunteering, or simply staying informed, our actions matter.

As we look ahead, let’s remember that our collective efforts can bring about the changes we want to see. The Montana Values Podcast will be here every step of the way, breaking down the complexities and giving you the tools to make an impact.

Thank you for joining us on this journey through Montana’s political landscape. Let’s keep the conversation going and work together to create a government that truly serves its people.

Stay Connected:
• Follow us on X: @MTValues
• Email us: [email protected]
• Subscribe on Podbean or wherever you get your podcasts.

Support Our Work: Consider sponsoring our show by visiting montanavaluespodcast.com, finding the sponsor page, and clicking the donate button. Your voice and your vote make a difference. Let’s use them wisely.
This post combines insights from the episode with actionable steps, ensuring readers feel empowered to act on what they’ve learned.

Welcome to Episode 94: The True Test of Montana Values

Voting Beyond Labels and Recognizing the Worst Political Ads in Montana.
In this episode of the Montana Values Podcast, we’re pulling back the curtain on Montana’s political campaign ads and showing how they don’t all live up to Montana’s standards. As political ads hit us from every angle, Tammi and Mickey break down the five worst ads targeting Montanans today, diving deep into the tactics of fear-mongering, hypocrisy, and sheer misinformation. We’re not just exposing these ads but also giving you actionable ways to navigate this season's political noise and vote for people—not parties.

Here’s what we’ll cover to give you real takeaways from this episode:

Insights into Butte, Montana: Our walkabout reveals Butte’s unique local culture and the heated sheriff’s race, showcasing how history and politics intertwined here.
Political Ad Tactics: Understand how ads manipulate through emotion and bias and why it’s crucial to recognize these tricks.
Montana’s Five Worst Campaign Ads: We dive into specific ads and their troubling, sometimes absurd, contradictions.
​A Guide to Cutting Through Political Propaganda: We’re not just identifying problems; we’re giving you the tools to stay informed and cast a meaningful vote.
Let’s dig into how you can make sense of this campaign season and vote for values that truly align with Montana’s spirit.

Butte’s Unique Politics and Best Pork Chop Sandwiches
Our journey starts in Butte, Montana—a place built on immigrant communities and tough locals. Butte is unique, not just for its people but for its city-county government structure. This episode introduces you to the current sheriff’s race, where Butte-native Ed Lester faces newcomer Mike Gage. While Gage is using a podcast to reach voters, Lester is a long-standing local figure, rooted in Butte’s history. 
And we can’t mention Butte without discussing the best pork chop sandwiches in town! The locals know that The Freeway Bar (cash only) is the hidden gem. Just like that, Butte stands out from the crowd.

Takeaway: Why Local Matters
In Montana, knowing where a candidate comes from and their roots in the community gives insight into how they might lead.

Here’s what you can do:
Learn Local Backgrounds: Check a candidate’s local history, their affiliations, and the connections they have within the community.
Attend Town Hall Events: In smaller communities like Butte, these are great spaces to see how candidates engage and interact with locals.

The Art of Campaign Ads and Political Propaganda
Campaign season means we’re flooded with ads on every channel, and Montana’s constitutional initiatives bring even more attention—and noise—to local races. But campaign ads aren’t just informative; they’re designed to steer emotions, manipulate beliefs, and often distract from a candidate’s true record. In this episode, we dissect these ads and the emotional tactics they deploy.

Takeaway: Spotting Manipulation in Ads
It’s easy to get caught up in the emotional pull of political ads, but here’s how you can see past the tricks:
Look for Factual Content: If an ad doesn’t provide concrete, actionable points, it may be relying on emotion over substance.
​Research Claims: Cross-check statements in ads. News outlets and local media can help confirm—or debunk—political claims.
Notice Visual and Emotional Cues: Ads use powerful images or language to sway viewers. Recognize these cues and dig deeper into the substance behind them.

The Five Worst Political Ads in Montana
Now, let’s count down the five worst campaign ads in Montana this season. These ads don’t just make lofty promises—they display hypocrisy and blatant contradictions.

1. Jon Tester’s Lobbyist Ties
The Claim: Tester is a top recipient of lobbyist money.
What’s Missing: The ad’s creator, Tim Sheehy, runs his own lobbying firm, taking lobbyist money himself.
Takeaway: Hypocrisy undermines credibility. If a candidate’s backers benefit from what they criticize, they’re out of line.

2. Last Best Place PAC’s Attack on Sheehy
The Claim: Sheehy defaulted on a loan.
What’s Missing: The “loan” was a PPP loan—relief available to many businesses and widely forgiven.
Takeaway: Look beyond a PAC’s message to understand its motivations. Here, a PAC pushing student loan forgiveness criticizes pandemic relief—revealing a clear double standard.

3. Monica Tranel’s “Montana is Not for Sale”
The Claim: Ryan Zinke is “bankrolled by China.”
​What’s Missing: A $2,500 donation is portrayed as foreign control.
Takeaway: Beware exaggeration in ads. Grandiose claims often lack factual support, but their intent is to incite fear or mistrust.

4. Justice Project PAC’s Misinformation Text
The Claim: Judges can “overturn” Montana’s right to privacy.
​What’s Missing: Judicial rulings don’t change state constitutions.
Takeaway: Misinformation spreads quickly, especially in texts. Verify judicial powers and legislative roles before believing dramatic claims.
​
5. Monica Tranel’s “Housing Profiteer” Attack
The Claim: Zinke’s vacation rental business drives up housing costs.
​What’s Missing: Tranel herself holds stock in a vacation rental company.
Takeaway: Double standards undermine credibility. A candidate attacking legal rentals while profiting from similar investments shows a lack of integrity.
These ads illustrate the importance of going beyond flashy ads to find genuine value.

Decoding Campaign Propaganda in Montana
As Montanans, we know our values and have a responsibility to vote for leaders who truly embody them. Don’t let party loyalty overshadow a candidate’s actions. This episode offers steps to navigate propaganda, understand local values, and make meaningful choices.

Actionable Steps for Voting With Values
Meet Candidates in Person: Attend events, forums, or rallies to see if they align with Montana values or if their ads are just for show.
​Question Campaign Messages: Don’t be afraid to ask tough questions or hold candidates accountable for statements made in their ads.
Research Their Record: Look at candidates’ past actions, votes, and behavior in office to see if they truly represent what they claim.

Conclusion: Voting With Conviction
Each vote we cast is a reinforcement of our values. Montana deserves leaders who honor the community, not those who use it for personal gain or political games. This election season, let’s make sure we’re voting with conviction, choosing candidates whose actions reflect the spirit of Montana.

Montana's Crisis: State Hospital Failures and Highway Patrol Turnover

Welcome to Episode 93 of the Montana Values Podcast. Today, we're peeling back the
layers on some serious issues affecting our state. These aren’t just stories to skim
over—they're crises that impact all of us. From the crumbling state of Montana’s only
psychiatric hospital to the leadership failures in our Highway Patrol, the stakes couldn’t be higher. You deserve to know how your tax dollars are being mismanaged and why it matters for the safety and wellbeing of our communities.
In this post, I’m going to break down what’s really happening, why it’s important, and
most importantly, what you can do about it. We’re not just talking about
problems—we’re talking about real solutions. Let’s dive in.

The Ongoing Crisis at the Montana State Hospital

The Montana State Hospital at Warm Springs has been in serious trouble for a while
now, but things have gone from bad to catastrophic. A few years back, Medicare and
Medicaid yanked their funding. Why? Because the care was so bad that it wasn’t just
failing to meet federal standards—it was dangerous. Patients were dying, getting
injured, or worse, being assaulted. When a hospital loses Medicare and Medicaid
funding, it’s because the problems are beyond repair. That’s the grim reality we’re
facing.

Why It Should Matter to You

This crisis isn’t just affecting the patients—though, let’s be clear, these are some of
Montana’s most vulnerable citizens. It’s also hitting taxpayers right in the wallet. Without Medicare and Medicaid, we’re picking up the tab, paying millions in state taxes to cover the costs. And for what? A hospital that isn’t even safe. The most vulnerable are left to fend for themselves in a system that is falling apart.

How Did We Get Here?

Here’s where things get frustrating. Instead of turning to local experts who understand the complexities of Montana’s healthcare needs, the Gianforte administration outsourced the problem to out-of-state consultants. Millions have been spent on these so-called experts; and after cycling through five administrators in two years, nothing has improved. We’re paying them to fail.

The Secret Contract and Lack of Transparency

If that wasn’t bad enough, the administration recently tried to sneak through a shady
contract, this time to a Connecticut company. The plan? To ship off “difficult to place” psychiatric patients—people with severe mental illness who can’t find care anywhere else in the state. These folks have been discharged from Warm Springs or even prison, but no facility in Montana will take them. The kicker? This contract was made behind closed doors. If it weren’t for local media exposing it, we wouldn’t have known. And instead of consulting with mental health advocates, the administration just tried to push it through quietly, giving a mere 10 days for other companies to submit bids once the press got wind of it.

Montana’s Highway Patrol: Turnover and Leadership

Failures
While the state hospital’s crisis is terrifying, it’s not the only place where leadership is failing us. Our Montana Highway Patrol is also in deep trouble. Troopers who have
served 15, 20 years are now opting to self-demote. They’re so fed up with the poor
leadership and unsafe working conditions that they’d rather step down the career ladder than stick it out.

What’s Happening on the Ground

Imagine being a veteran trooper, out on a dark Montana highway at night, and your
backup is someone fresh out of the academy with five months of experience. That’s the reality our troopers are facing. The turnover rate in the Highway Patrol is the highest of any law enforcement branch in the state. We’re losing not just officers, but years of experience, professionalism, and know-how. And when troopers are left without proper backup or leadership, it’s not just their safety on the line—it’s ours too.

Why Are Troopers Walking Away?

This isn’t about pay. Troopers are walking away because they feel unsupported,
unappreciated, and unsafe. The leadership at the top, led by Attorney General Austin
Knudsen, has failed them. We’ve seen this in the results of a damning culture survey
initiated by Colonel Steve Lavin, who was later forced to resign by Knudsen after the
results revealed just how bad morale was under his watch. Lavin is now suing for
wrongful termination, and other troopers, like Alicia Bragg, have followed suit, fighting against a system that punishes them for speaking out.

What Can We Do? Practical Steps for Change

These issues at both the state hospital and the Highway Patrol aren’t unsolvable, but it’s going to take real action to turn things around. Here’s what needs to happen—and how you can help:

1. Demand Better Leadership and Accountability
Montana needs leadership that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and solutions that actually work. We can’t keep letting out-of-state consultants drain our tax dollars while failing to fix the problems. We need local experts, people who know Montana and care about Montanans, to step in and take charge.

What You Can Do:

Reach out to your local representatives. Let them know you care about what’s
happening at the state hospital and in the Highway Patrol. Demand transparency and
better leadership. Hold them accountable for making changes that improve the safety and well-being of Montanans.

2. Advocate for Improved Working Conditions for Troopers
It’s not enough to just hire more troopers—we need to retain the ones we have by
creating a better, safer work environment. That means providing them with the
resources, training, and mental health support they need to do their jobs effectively.

What You Can Do:

Stay informed and spread the word. Talk to your friends, family, and neighbors about
these issues. Share this episode with them. The more people who know, the more
pressure we can put on our leaders to make changes.

3. Support Your Local Troopers
Montana troopers put their lives on the line for us every day, but they need our support too. Reach out to your local Highway Patrol office and ask how you can help. Whether it’s through donations, community events, or simply letting them know you appreciate their service, every bit helps.

4. Push for Legislation that Prioritizes Health and Safety
Montana needs smarter policies, not just more money thrown at the problem. We need to pass legislation that improves working conditions for troopers, supports mental health initiatives for both law enforcement and vulnerable citizens, and ensures that tax dollars are being spent wisely.

What You Can Do:

Advocate for policies that make sense. Write to your legislators, attend town halls, and push for real reforms that will address these issues head-on.

The Road Ahead

Montana’s Highway Patrol and State Hospital are both at critical junctures. The longer we let these issues slide, the worse things will get. Our troopers and vulnerable citizens deserve better, and frankly, so do we. The safety of our communities depends on having well-supported, well-trained, and well-led law enforcement teams, as well as properly managed healthcare institutions.

In this episode, we’ve uncovered the truth behind the dysfunction, but now it’s up to all of us to demand change. Don’t just sit on this information—act on it. Reach out to your representatives, support your local troopers, and keep the pressure on for better leadership and accountability. Because at the end of the day, Montana values are about standing up for what’s right—and that includes standing up for the people who protect us and care for our most vulnerable.

​Episode 92: Montana's Pre-Release Centers — More Harm Than Good?
Welcome to the latest episode of the Montana Values podcast. Today, in our 92nd show, we’re diving deep into the Montana Legislature's and Greg Gianforte's misguided efforts that might just turn our beloved state into something akin to the “Hotel California.” First, in our walkabout the state, we're zeroing in on the impact fee controversy in Whitefish and then we discuss overarching issues in Montana's correctional system. Together we'll unravel the complexities and consequences of these policies.

Understanding Whitefish's Impact Fees: A Crazy Policy Explained
Our journey begins in Whitefish, or as we affectionately call it, the "People's Republic of Whitefish," a nickname born from the often eccentric policies- mostly adopted out of a desire to control and tax- emerging from its City Council. 
Whitefish has recently been embroiled in a lawsuit over their exorbitant impact fees, which are essentially taxes levied on developers for the ‘privilege’ of developing their property. These fees are some of the highest in the state, soaring up to $5,000 per single-family house. These fees trickle down to home buyers, exacerbating the affordable housing crisis.

In 2019, Whitefish decided to calculate these fees based on the number of fixtures and faucets in a house. When an error in their Excel-based formula was discovered, the city initially balked at a full audit, fearing the financial repercussions. Eventually, a class action lawsuit led to a $1.4 million settlement, pinning $1 million of that on the consultants who crafted the flawed formula.
This episode highlights the critical need for transparency in how cities use consultants and the necessity for community vigilance in fiscal decisions that directly affect us all.

Pre-Release Centers: Are They Solving or Exacerbating Problems?
Turning to state issues, we discuss Montana's corrections policies that our trickling down to the community our Hosts live in. Montana’s prison population is spiraling out of control, with the Department of Corrections (DOC) ill-equipped to manage it. The state’s solution has been to push for expanding pre-release centers, which ostensibly serve as transitional housing for inmates nearing sentence completion. However, the reality is that these centers are now used as under-resourced prisons where inmates serve out their days without access to the court ordered treatment that is a part of their sentences.  Without making any effort to rehabilitate these convicts as there are no treatment beds available, the DOC itself is contributing to high recidivism rates and community safety concerns.

Evergreen's Stand Against a New Pre-Release Center
Back in 2009, our community successfully fought against a proposed pre-release center in Kalispell. Now, the DOC is eyeing Evergreen, targeting economically vulnerable areas for new centers, with minimal public oversight. This has stoked fears of increased crime rates and lower property values among residents.

Actionable Steps for Montana Citizens 
It’s crucial for us Montanans to stay informed and engaged. Here’s what you can do:

• Educate Yourself and Your Community: Understand the policies and proposals being discussed in local council meetings or state legislatures.
• Participate in Community Meetings: Voice your concerns and listen to others. These forums are invaluable for shaping the future of our local governance.
• Hold Leaders Accountable: Vote, and contact your representatives about your concerns with their policies, especially those that impact housing affordability and community safety.
• Support Local Journalism: Stay informed with local news sources that dig into these issues. Consider subscribing or donating to news outlets that provide in-depth coverage.

Thank you for joining us on this exploration of pressing issues in our state. Remember, every step you take, whether it's a conversation you start or a meeting you attend, helps ensure that our community values are reflected in our laws and policies.

Until next time, stay informed and engaged. Don't forget to follow us on X @MTValues and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Share with us your favorite Montana value at [email protected]. Thanks for listening!

Montana Values: Navigating the Financial Challenges in Our State
Welcome back to the Montana Values Podcast! Today, we delve deep into the heart of Montana's fiscal challenges—a topic that impacts each of us directly. Through our recent podcast episode, we explored the complexities of local and state financial management and what it means for the hard-working people of our state. Let's unpack the financial maneuvers and mismanagement affecting our communities and provide you with actionable steps to make a difference.

Podcast Highlights and Engagements

In Episode 91 of the Montana Values podcast, we opened up about our engaging conversations with other influential Montanans. We discussed our recent collaborations, such as our appearances on the State of Montana podcast with Russell Roland and the International Women's Day 406 podcast with Julie and Kate. These conversations across the political spectrum are crucial as they enrich our understanding and responses to Montana’s unique challenges.

The Growing Tax Burden in Missoula

Focusing on Missoula, we highlighted the alarming increase in property taxes—nearly a 40% rise over the past three years. These hikes are affecting our most vulnerable populations: the working poor and the elderly on fixed incomes. It’s evident that the justification comparing Missoula to cities like Bozeman and Helena does little to alleviate the actual impact on our residents.

Transparency Issues with Special Districts

We also tackled the issue of "special districts" in Missoula. These districts divert funds from general municipal needs like parks and streetlights to less transparent accounts, complicating how residents understand and track their tax contributions. This lack of clarity is a significant part of the financial strain many Montanans feel.

Mismanagement Examples: Helena’s Fire Station

A striking example of fiscal mismanagement is Helena’s decision to build a new fire station without the necessary funds for staffing. This situation mirrors past errors, such as the underutilized fire station in Kalispell, showcasing a recurring pattern of poor financial planning.

Broader State Tax Issues

Statewide, the tax burden has increasingly shifted from commercial entities to residential property owners. This shift places an unsustainable load on homeowners, especially impacting those with fixed incomes.

Gianforte’s Committee Initiatives

Governor Gianforte's formation of a tax committee was a response to widespread frustration with rising taxes. While the committee's efforts might seem delayed, they have proposed some beneficial ideas, like equalizing school funding across counties, which could significantly lessen educational disparities.

Effective Proposals from the Committee

One of the more effective suggestions from the committee was to present tax levies to voters in dollar amounts instead of mill rates, enhancing transparency. We also support the introduction of sunset clauses to funding mechanisms, which would require these measures to be reevaluated and renewed periodically, ensuring they remain relevant and effective.

Addressing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Districts

Our discussion also covered the misuse of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts. While intended to spur redevelopment, these districts have often been leveraged to fund projects that don’t necessarily benefit the general fund or the public. Reforming TIF regulations could help ensure these funds are used appropriately.

Actionable Steps for Montanans
To address these issues, we encourage every Montanan to take proactive steps:

1. Educate Yourself and Your Community: Learn more about where your taxes go and share this knowledge.
2. Participate in Local Governance: Attend city council meetings and voice your concerns about fiscal policies.
3. Vote Responsibly: Use your vote to support candidates and policies that advocate for fiscal responsibility and transparency.
4. Support Advocacy Groups: Engage with local organizations that promote tax fairness and governmental transparency.
   

Concluding Thoughts

By understanding and participating in our local and state financial discussions, we can push for a system that truly represents and supports the needs of all Montanans. Let’s continue this conversation and work together towards a fairer, more transparent fiscal environment in Montana.
Thank you for tuning in to this discussion on the Montana Values podcast and blog. Stay engaged, stay informed, and let’s uphold the values that make Montana great. Remember, you can listen to the full podcast episode on Podbean or your preferred podcast platform. For any further inquiries or suggestions, reach out to us at [email protected]. Join us next time as we continue to champion the values that define our state!

Today, we had the happy privilege of meeting Russell Rowland in person. We've been a guest twice on his podcast, The State of Montana, and he happened to be in the Flathead this weekend, and we were thrilled to sit down with him one on one. Russell is on the other side of the aisle from us politically, but that didn't stop us from having a wonderful discussion filled with lots of laughs. We share a love for our great state and we're Montanans first, everything else comes somewhere after that! Here at MVP, we believe in more speech, not less. We need to be willing to sit down with the opposite side and have meaningful conversations. Who knows, you may even form gratifying friendships as a result! We have much more in common than we think. Our mutual love for our state is our common denominator. As a HUGE added bonus for us, Russell was gracious enough to sign copies of his great book, "56 Counties." Grab your copy today!
amzn.to/3WJCpGg